Pilot live: ACP for AI commerce.Explore ACP
Scenario testing agent

Test fifty scenarios. Pick one with confidence.

Sam simulates channel shifts, spend changes, and new strategies in seconds. Every scenario priced against Felix's forecasts before a dollar moves.

Why this exists

Strategy by trial and error. Paid for in real budget.

Tests cost real money to run.

A new channel mix takes $30K to $50K to validate. Most brands can only afford two or three tests per quarter, so most strategies never get tested at all.

Cycles take weeks, not seconds.

Shift budget on Monday, wait two to three weeks for signal, analyze, decide. By the time the answer arrives, the market has already moved.

One variable at a time.

A team can realistically test one budget change at a time. Combinatorial questions like Meta up, Google down, TikTok added stay in the spreadsheet, never in the wild.

Cross-channel effects stay invisible.

What happens to Google when Meta shifts? What's the TikTok halo on organic? Channel interactions never show up in a single-axis test.

What Sam ships

Five capabilities. One scenario workflow.

Each capability maps to a specific job: simulate the budget, find the elastic channel, model the risk, score the recommendation, and stay aware of the rest of the workforce.

Fifty scenarios in seconds

Monte Carlo simulation across channel splits, spend curves, and timing shifts. One question becomes fifty priced outcomes.

  • Combinatorial budget mixes, not single-axis tests
  • Each scenario priced with a confidence band
  • Top five surfaced; the rest are inspectable

Example. 70/30 Meta/Google asked; 65/35, 60/40, and TikTok-15 also tested

Elasticity discovery

Sam identifies which channel actually responds to spend changes and which one is already saturated.

  • Per-channel response curves fit nightly
  • Saturation points flagged before overspend
  • Diminishing-returns thresholds surfaced per account

Example. TikTok elastic to +40%, Google Brand saturated past +8%

Risk-free what-if

Every strategy gets simulated before commitment. Upside, downside, and break-even priced before any budget moves.

  • Worst-case bands, not just expected outcomes
  • Cannibalization between campaigns modelled
  • $0 spent before validation

Example. Doubling BFCM spend: +34% revenue, but CPMs up 2.4x, net margin down

Confidence-scored recommendations

Top five scenarios ranked by expected outcome, each with a confidence band and the assumptions behind the prediction.

  • Confidence percentage per recommendation
  • Assumptions visible, not hidden in the model
  • Risk and reward shown side by side

Example. Shift 20% Meta to TikTok: CAC down 12% by week 6 at 87% confidence

Workforce-aware

Reads Felix's forecasts, Maya's CAC ceilings, Parker's incrementality. No silo, no manual reconciliation.

  • Felix prices each scenario with current models
  • Maya supplies budget caps and prior outcomes
  • Parker validates which past wins were real lift

Example. +30% Meta shift requested; Felix priced it in 4 seconds with bands

A typical week

What Sam runs while the team is in standup.

One workweek, hour by hour. Specific numbers vary by account.

Mon · 8:42 AM
Tested

Strategist asks: what if we shift 20% of Meta to TikTok for Q2? Maya supplies budget caps and prior TikTok outcomes; the question gets framed in seconds.

Mon · 8:42 AM
Tested

Sam fans out 52 variants around the question. 65/35, 60/40, 70/30 with TikTok at 10, 15, 20 percent, plus three timing curves on each.

Mon · 8:43 AM
Scored

Felix prices every variant. Each scenario gets a revenue range, a CAC range, and a confidence percentage. Eleven seconds, end to end.

Mon · 8:44 AM
Compared

Top five surfaced, side by side. Best CAC at 87 percent confidence: 65/35 Meta/TikTok with a 2-week ramp. Worst case priced too: revenue dip of 6 percent in week one.

Mon · 9:15 AM
Delivered

Sam ships the recommendation to Slack with the assumption set, the confidence band, and a link to the four other ranked scenarios.

Tue · 11:02 AM
Approved

Strategist approves the 65/35 plan. Dex builds the brief; Felix watches the actuals against Sam's prediction starting next cycle.

Wed · 4:18 PM
Recommended

Competitor doubles spend overnight. Sam simulates 20 defensive counter-moves, ranks the top three, sends to Slack within the hour.

What's underneath

Real simulation engine. Not a recommendation wrapper.

Sam runs on Monte Carlo simulation, channel-level elasticity curves, and shared memory across the workforce. Every scenario gets priced against live forecasts, not stale benchmarks.

Reads from

Felix's nightly forecasts and historical campaign outcomes from the workforce memory. Sam never simulates against stale numbers or industry averages.

Felix forecasts + reconciled campaign history

Reports to

Slack for ranked recommendations and confidence bands, Slides for the strategy review deck. Format adapted to the surface and the audience.

SlackGoogle Slides

Top five scenarios delivered within seconds of the ask

Collaborates with

Felix prices every scenario with the current forecast model. Maya supplies CAC ceilings, prior outcomes, and budget constraints so Sam never tests a plan that violates the brand's rules.

Shared memory, not message-passing

Built on

Monte Carlo simulation across channel-level response curves. Elasticity discovery refits nightly per account; confidence bands derived from backtested forecast accuracy.

Per-account elasticity, refit nightly

Ready when you are

See Sam test fifty scenarios on your account, or talk to us about your stack.

The pilot connects your accounts to all seven agents. Bring a what-if question; Sam returns ranked, priced answers in under a minute.

Looking for something specific? Felix forecasts the outcome, Maya holds the constraints or Parker validates real lift.